DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Renault 19 vs 2004 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRenault
19ModelClio
1998Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

14,8 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
187 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
90 HPPower98 HP
131 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size165/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4162 mmLength3773 mm
1696 mmWidth1640 mm
1412 mmHeight1417 mm
965 KgWeight965 Kg
2544 mmWheelbase2475 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Renault 19 and 2004 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…