DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Renault 19 vs 1996 Fiat Tempra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Tempra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3 points.

46.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFiat
19ModelTempra
1998Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

14,8 s0–100 km/h13,9 s
187 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1929 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
131 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,9 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size175/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4162 mmLength4354 mm
1696 mmWidth1695 mm
1412 mmHeight1545 mm
965 KgWeight1188 Kg
2544 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Renault 19 and 1996 Fiat Tempra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Tempra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…