DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Renault 19 vs 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 156

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 18.5 points.

46.25–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeAlfa Romeo
19Model156
1997Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

14,8 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
187 km/hTop speed209 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1910 cc
90 HPPower140 HP
131 NmTorque305 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank63 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption8 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
165/70 R13Tyre size185/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4162 mmLength4435 mm
1696 mmWidth1743 mm
1412 mmHeight1430 mm
965 KgWeight1305 Kg
2544 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Renault 19 and 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 156 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 18.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…