DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Renault 19 vs 2008 Ford Tourneo Connect Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Tourneo Connect

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 20 points.

46.25–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFord
19ModelTourneo Connect
1996Model year2008
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

14,8 s0–100 km/h—
187 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
90 HPPower115 HP
131 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size195/65 R15

Dimensions

4162 mmLength4278 mm
1696 mmWidth1795 mm
1412 mmHeight1814 mm
965 KgWeight1425 Kg
2544 mmWheelbase2664 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Renault 19 and 2008 Ford Tourneo Connect approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Tourneo Connect leads the E-Kıyasla score by 20 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…