DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Renault 19 vs 2000 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFiat
19ModelBravo
1995Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3

Performance

12,2 s0–100 km/h13,7 s
173 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1369 cc
80 HPPower80 HP
109 NmTorque112 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption9 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size165/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4162 mmLength4025 mm
1696 mmWidth1755 mm
1412 mmHeight1420 mm
970 KgWeight985 Kg
2544 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Renault 19 and 2000 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…