2000 • Renault
19
Renault 19 1.4i (60 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Renault 19 vs 1996 Fiat Tempra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Fiat
Tempra
Fiat Tempra 1.4 i.e. (159.AC,159.AX) 1996Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Renault 19
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault 19SpecificationFiat Tempra
RenaultMakeFiat
19ModelTempra
2000Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4
Performance
Renault 19SpecificationFiat Tempra
14,8 s0–100 km/h14,4 s
162 km/hTop speed163 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1372 cc
60 HPPower69 HP
102 NmTorque106 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Renault 19SpecificationFiat Tempra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,9 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Renault 19SpecificationFiat Tempra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size175/65 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Renault 19SpecificationFiat Tempra
4162 mmLength4353 mm
1696 mmWidth1695 mm
1412 mmHeight1445 mm
965 KgWeight1053 Kg
2544 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Renault 19 and 1996 Fiat Tempra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault 19 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…