DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Renault 19 vs 2000 Tata Indica Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tata Indica

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeTata
19ModelIndica
1996Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

14,8 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
162 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1405 cc
60 HPPower60 HP
102 NmTorque105 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank37 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption10 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size155/70 R13
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4162 mmLength3660 mm
1696 mmWidth1625 mm
1412 mmHeight1485 mm
965 KgWeight930 Kg
2544 mmWheelbase2400 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Renault 19 and 2000 Tata Indica approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tata Indica leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…