DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1983 Renault 14 vs 1996 Renault 19 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault 19

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 6 points.

40.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRenault
14Model19
1983Model year1996
—Body typeHatchback
—Seats5
—Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h14,8 s
0 km/hTop speed187 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
58 HPPower90 HP
0 NmTorque131 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption8,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,3 lt
—Average consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size165/70 R13

Dimensions

—Length4162 mm
—Width1696 mm
—Height1412 mm
—Weight965 Kg
—Wheelbase2544 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1983 Renault 14 and 1996 Renault 19 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault 19 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 6 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

Comments are loading…