1980 • Renault
12
Renault 12 1.3 (1170) 1980Overall Score40.25/100
1980 Renault 12 vs 1999 AC ACE Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • AC
ACE
AC ACE 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (354 Hp) 1999Overall Score81.5/100
WINNER
AC ACE
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 41.25 points.
40.25–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault 12SpecificationAC ACE
RenaultMakeAC
12ModelACE
1980Model year1999
—Body typeCabriolet
—Seats2
—Doors2
Performance
Renault 12SpecificationAC ACE
—0–100 km/h5,5 s
0 km/hTop speed250 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement3506 cc
50 HPPower354 HP
0 NmTorque407 Nm
—Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Renault 12SpecificationAC ACE
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank90 lt
—Urban consumption20 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Renault 12SpecificationAC ACE
—DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears6
—Tyre size245/40 ZR18; 255/45 ZR18
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Renault 12SpecificationAC ACE
—Length4420 mm
—Width1870 mm
—Height1300 mm
—Weight1510 Kg
—Wheelbase2470 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1980 Renault 12 and 1999 AC ACE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, AC ACE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 41.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
Comments are loading…