DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Alfa Romeo 155 vs 2016 Buick Cascada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Buick Cascada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 11.25 points.

64.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeBuick
155ModelCascada
1998Model year2016
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

7,0 s0–100 km/h—
225 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
190 HPPower200 HP
291 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank54 lt
—Urban consumption14,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,5 lt
9,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/50 R15Tyre size245/40 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4443 mmLength4696 mm
1700 mmWidth1839 mm
1440 mmHeight1447 mm
1445 KgWeight1805 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2695 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Alfa Romeo 155 and 2016 Buick Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Buick Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 11.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…