DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 RAM 1500 vs 2014 Lincoln MKS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln MKS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RAM 1500SpecificationLincoln MKS
RAMMakeLincoln
1500ModelMKS
2016Model year2014
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5-6Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

RAM 1500SpecificationLincoln MKS
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3604 ccEngine displacement3496 cc
305 HPPower365 HP
364 NmTorque475 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

RAM 1500SpecificationLincoln MKS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Urban consumption13,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,4 lt
—Average consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

RAM 1500SpecificationLincoln MKS
4x4Drivetrain4x4
8Gears6 SelectShift
265/70 R17Tyre size245/45 R20V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

RAM 1500SpecificationLincoln MKS
6043 mmLength5222 mm
—Width2017 mm
1965 mmHeight1565 mm
—Weight2012 Kg
3795 mmWheelbase2868 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 RAM 1500 and 2014 Lincoln MKS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln MKS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…