DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Proton Preve vs 2012 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Proton Preve

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ProtonMakeVolvo
PreveModelC30
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
109 HPPower114 HP
150 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank52 lt
—Urban consumption4,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,5 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4543 mmLength4266 mm
1786 mmWidth1782 mm
1524 mmHeight1447 mm
1325 KgWeight1354 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Proton Preve and 2012 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Proton Preve leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…