DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Porsche Boxster vs 2017 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Porsche Boxster

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

89.5–88.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PorscheMakeLand Rover
BoxsterModelRange Rover
2016Model year2017
CabrioletBody typeSUV
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

5,1 s0–100 km/h7,4 s
279 km/hTop speed209 km/h
3436 ccEngine displacement2995 cc
315 HPPower340 HP
360 NmTorque450 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank103 lt
12,7 ltUrban consumption13,6 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears8
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4374 mmLength5000 mm
1801 mmWidth—
1281 mmHeight1869 mm
1340 KgWeight2256 Kg
2475 mmWheelbase2922 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Porsche Boxster and 2017 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Porsche Boxster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…