DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Audi TT vs 2010 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi TT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

87.5–86.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeLand Rover
TTModelRange Rover
2010Model year2010
CoupeBody typeSUV
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

5,9 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
250 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3189 ccEngine displacement3628 cc
250 HPPower271 HP
320 NmTorque630 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank105 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption—
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,3 ltAverage consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
245/45 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4178 mmLength4972 mm
1842 mmWidth—
1352 mmHeight1865 mm
1410 KgWeight—
2468 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Audi TT and 2010 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi TT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…