DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Audi TT vs 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi TT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

87.5–86.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeLand Rover
TTModelRange Rover Sport
2008Model year2008
CoupeBody typeSUV
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

5,9 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
250 km/hTop speed209 km/h
3189 ccEngine displacement3628 cc
250 HPPower272 HP
320 NmTorque640 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank84 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
10,3 ltAverage consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
245/45 R17Tyre size275/40 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4178 mmLength4790 mm
1842 mmWidth1930 mm
1352 mmHeight1785 mm
1410 KgWeight2675 Kg
2468 mmWheelbase2745 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Audi TT and 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi TT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…