DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Audi TT vs 2017 Volvo V90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi TT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

84.5–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi TTSpecificationVolvo V90
AudiMakeVolvo
TTModelV90
2017Model year2017
CoupeBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Audi TTSpecificationVolvo V90
6,0 s0–100 km/h7,5 s
250 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
230 HPPower235 HP
370 NmTorque480 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi TTSpecificationVolvo V90
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,3 ltUrban consumption5,9 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi TTSpecificationVolvo V90
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears8
—TransmissionGeartronic
225/50 R17Tyre size18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi TTSpecificationVolvo V90
4177 mmLength4939 mm
1832 mmWidth1879 mm
1353 mmHeight1543 mm
1230 KgWeight2225 kg
—Luggage capacity913 lt
2505 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Audi TT

No additional feature records are available.

Volvo V90Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeHill Start AssistCruise ControlCollision Avoidance SystemComing HomeLeaving HomeTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerKeyless Startstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsHeated Steering WheelLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsFront Parking SensorsRear Parking SensorsReversing CameraAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetoothNavigation

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Audi TT and 2017 Volvo V90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi TT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…