2017 • Audi
TT
Audi TT 2.0 TFSI (230 Hp) 2017Overall Score84.5/100
2017 Audi TT vs 2017 Jaguar F-Pace Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Jaguar
F-Pace
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d (240 Hp) 2017Overall Score83.75/100
WINNER
Audi TT
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
84.5–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi TTSpecificationJaguar F-Pace
AudiMakeJaguar
TTModelF-Pace
2017Model year2017
CoupeBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Audi TTSpecificationJaguar F-Pace
6,0 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
250 km/hTop speed217 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
230 HPPower240 HP
370 NmTorque500 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi TTSpecificationJaguar F-Pace
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,3 ltUrban consumption—
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,9 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Audi TTSpecificationJaguar F-Pace
4177 mmLength4746 mm
1832 mmWidth2070 mm
1353 mmHeight1667 mm
1230 KgWeight1810 Kg
2505 mmWheelbase2874 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Audi TT and 2017 Jaguar F-Pace approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Audi TT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableBMW X5 vs Audi TT2017 and 2017 model years
VSImage unavailableVolvo V90 vs Audi TT2017 and 2017 model years
VSImage unavailableBMW 3 Serisi vs Audi TT2017 and 2017 model years
VSImage unavailableLand Rover Range Rover Sport vs Audi TT2017 and 2017 model yearsVSImage unavailableJaguar F-Pace vs Audi TT2017 and 2017 model yearsComments are loading…