E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Audi TT vs 2016 KTM X-Bow Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi TTSpecificationKTM X-Bow
AudiMakeKTM
TTModelX-Bow
2016Model year2016
CoupeBody typeRoadster
2+2Seats2
2Doors—

Performance

Audi TTSpecificationKTM X-Bow
5,3 s0–100 km/h3,9 s
210 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
220 HPPower240 HP
350 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi TTSpecificationKTM X-Bow
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank40 lt
—Average consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi TTSpecificationKTM X-Bow
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6 S tronicGears6
245/40 R18Tyre size205/40 R17; 235/40 R18
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi TTSpecificationKTM X-Bow
4184 mmLength3738 mm
1832 mmWidth1915 mm
1353 mmHeight1202 mm
1435 KgWeight790 Kg
2505 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Audi TT and 2016 KTM X-Bow approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Image unavailableVSImage unavailableBorgward BX6 vs Audi TT2016 and 2016 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableBorgward BX7 vs Audi TT2016 and 2016 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableKTM X-Bow vs Audi TT2016 and 2016 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableLexus GS vs Audi TT2016 and 2016 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableLexus RC vs Audi TT2015 and 2016 model years

Comments are loading…