DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Audi TT vs 2013 KTM X-Bow Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.75–79.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi TTSpecificationKTM X-Bow
AudiMakeKTM
TTModelX-Bow
2013Model year2013
CoupeBody typeRoadster
2+2Seats2
2Doors—

Performance

Audi TTSpecificationKTM X-Bow
6,1 s0–100 km/h3,9 s
245 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
211 HPPower240 HP
350 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi TTSpecificationKTM X-Bow
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank40 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,6 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi TTSpecificationKTM X-Bow
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/55 R16Tyre size205/40 R17; 235/40 R18
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi TTSpecificationKTM X-Bow
4198 mmLength3738 mm
1842 mmWidth1915 mm
1353 mmHeight1202 mm
1280 KgWeight790 Kg
2468 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Audi TT and 2013 KTM X-Bow approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…