DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Audi TT vs 2014 Volkswagen Scirocco Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi TT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeVolkswagen
TTModelScirocco
2012Model year2014
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2+2Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

6,1 s0–100 km/h7,1 s
245 km/hTop speed233 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
211 HPPower211 HP
350 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,0 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—TransmissionDSG
225/55 R16Tyre size17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4198 mmLength4256 mm
1842 mmWidth1810 mm
1353 mmHeight1404 mm
1280 KgWeight1393 kg
—Luggage capacity292 lt
2468 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Audi TT

No additional feature records are available.

Volkswagen SciroccoDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistAuto HoldTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip Computerstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelCooled GloveboxDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsReversing Camera

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Audi TT and 2014 Volkswagen Scirocco approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi TT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…