DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Audi TT vs 2006 Caterham CSR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham CSR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.5–77.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi TTSpecificationCaterham CSR
AudiMakeCaterham
TTModelCSR
2006Model year2006
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
2+2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

Audi TTSpecificationCaterham CSR
6,6 s0–100 km/h3,7 s
240 km/hTop speed225 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
200 HPPower200 HP
280 NmTorque221 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi TTSpecificationCaterham CSR
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank42 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption16,6 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi TTSpecificationCaterham CSR
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/55 R16Tyre size195/45R15; 255/40 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi TTSpecificationCaterham CSR
4178 mmLength3300 mm
1842 mmWidth1685 mm
1352 mmHeight1140 mm
1260 KgWeight565 Kg
2468 mmWheelbase2315 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Audi TT and 2006 Caterham CSR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham CSR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…