DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Audi TT vs 2017 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

77.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeLand Rover
TTModelRange Rover Evoque
2017Model year2017
CoupeBody typeCoupe
4Seats—
2Doors—

Performance

6,7 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
234 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
184 HPPower180 HP
380 NmTorque430 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank54 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6 S tronicGears9
—TransmissionAutomatic
225/50 R17; 245/45 R17; 245/40 R18; 245/35 R19; 255/30 R20Tyre size19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4177 mmLength4370 mm
1832 mmWidth1985 mm
1353 mmHeight1635 mm
1375 KgWeight1674 kg
—Luggage capacity575 lt
2505 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Audi TT

No additional feature records are available.

Land Rover Range Rover EvoqueDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeHill Start AssistCruise ControlLane Keeping AssistComing HomeLeaving HomeTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerKeyless Startstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsFront Parking SensorsRear Parking SensorsReversing CameraAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsSunroofUSB PortBluetoothNavigation

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Audi TT and 2017 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…