DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Pontiac Sunfire vs 2002 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Pontiac Sunfire

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PontiacMakeFord
SunfireModelRanger
2002Model year2002
CoupeBody typePick-up
5Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2190 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
117 HPPower109 HP
183 NmTorque266 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
57 ltFuel tank70 lt
10 ltUrban consumption—
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
3Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4620 mmLength5020 mm
1710 mmWidth1695 mm
1390 mmHeight1750 mm
1200 KgWeight1399 Kg
2645 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Pontiac Sunfire and 2002 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Pontiac Sunfire leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…