DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Audi TT vs 2014 Chevrolet Captiva Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi TT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.75–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeChevrolet
TTModelCaptiva
2014Model year2014
CoupeBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

6,7 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
234 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
184 HPPower163 HP
380 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank65 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption9,9 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x2
6 S tronicGears6
—TransmissionAT
225/50 R17; 245/45 R17; 245/40 R18; 245/35 R19; 255/30 R20Tyre size17
YesABSNo

Dimensions

4177 mmLength4679 mm
1832 mmWidth1868 mm
1353 mmHeight1756 mm
1375 KgWeight1903 kg
—Luggage capacity447 lt
2505 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Audi TT and 2014 Chevrolet Captiva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi TT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…