DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Pontiac Grand AM vs 1994 Mazda Eunos 800 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Pontiac Grand AM

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PontiacMakeMazda
Grand AMModelEunos 800
1994Model year1994
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2392 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
152 HPPower200 HP
210 NmTorque224 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption—
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,4 ltAverage consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/60 R15Tyre size205/65 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4750 mmLength4825 mm
1730 mmWidth1770 mm
1360 mmHeight1395 mm
1395 KgWeight1440 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Pontiac Grand AM and 1994 Mazda Eunos 800 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Pontiac Grand AM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…