DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Audi TT vs 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi TT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeMitsubishi
TTModelLancer
2005Model year2004
CoupeBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

6,6 s0–100 km/h6,1 s
243 km/hTop speed245 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
225 HPPower265 HP
280 NmTorque355 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank55 lt
13,3 ltUrban consumption15,4 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption10,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
225/45 R17Tyre size235/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4041 mmLength4490 mm
1764 mmWidth1770 mm
1345 mmHeight1450 mm
1465 KgWeight1410 Kg
2429 mmWheelbase2625 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Audi TT and 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi TT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…