DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Audi TT vs 2003 Mazda RX-8 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda RX-8

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–77.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi TTSpecificationMazda RX-8
AudiMakeMazda
TTModelRX-8
2005Model year2003
CoupeBody typeCoupe
2+2Seats4
2Doors4

Performance

Audi TTSpecificationMazda RX-8
6,6 s0–100 km/h6,5 s
243 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1308 cc
225 HPPower250 HP
280 NmTorque216 Nm
4Cylinders2

Fuel & Consumption

Audi TTSpecificationMazda RX-8
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank61 lt
13,3 ltUrban consumption15,8 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi TTSpecificationMazda RX-8
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R17Tyre size245/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi TTSpecificationMazda RX-8
4041 mmLength4325 mm
1764 mmWidth1780 mm
1345 mmHeight1330 mm
1465 KgWeight1345 Kg
2429 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Audi TT and 2003 Mazda RX-8 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda RX-8 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…