DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Pontiac Bonneville vs 2002 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Commodore

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

69.75–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PontiacMakeHolden
BonnevilleModelCommodore
1999Model year2002
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
200 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
208 HPPower207 HP
312 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank75 lt
18 ltUrban consumption11 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/60 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5107 mmLength5084 mm
1892 mmWidth1847 mm
1415 mmHeight1545 mm
—Weight1635 Kg
2815 mmWheelbase2938 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Pontiac Bonneville and 2002 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…