DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Audi TT vs 2003 Jaguar X-type Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi TT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeJaguar
TTModelX-type
2003Model year2003
CoupeBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
220 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower130 HP
210 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank61 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4041 mmLength4672 mm
1764 mmWidth1789 mm
1346 mmHeight1430 mm
1280 KgWeight1500 Kg
2422 mmWheelbase2710 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Audi TT and 2003 Jaguar X-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi TT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…