DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Audi TT vs 2002 Honda Accord Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Accord

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.5–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi TTSpecificationHonda Accord
AudiMakeHonda
TTModelAccord
2002Model year2002
CoupeBody typeEstate
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Audi TTSpecificationHonda Accord
8,6 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement2254 cc
150 HPPower160 HP
210 NmTorque214 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi TTSpecificationHonda Accord
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption13 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi TTSpecificationHonda Accord
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/55 R16Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi TTSpecificationHonda Accord
4041 mmLength4740 mm
1764 mmWidth1730 mm
1346 mmHeight1445 mm
1280 KgWeight1380 Kg
2422 mmWheelbase2665 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Audi TT and 2002 Honda Accord approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Accord leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…