DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Peugeot RCZ vs 2000 Rover 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Peugeot RCZ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 9 points.

68.5–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeRover
RCZModel200
2012Model year2000
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2+2Seats5
2Doors3/5

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h7,5 s
217 km/hTop speed204 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
156 HPPower145 HP
240 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/45 R18Tyre size185/55 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4290 mmLength3973 mm
1958 mmWidth1688 mm
1362 mmHeight1419 mm
1275 KgWeight1135 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Peugeot RCZ and 2000 Rover 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Peugeot RCZ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 9 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…