DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Peugeot 806 vs 1996 Rover Mini MK Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Mini MK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeRover
806ModelMini MK
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

16,2 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
165 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1762 ccEngine displacement1273 cc
99 HPPower63 HP
147 NmTorque95 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank34 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption—
8,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/70 R14Tyre size145/70 R12 Q
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4454 mmLength3100 mm
1834 mmWidth1440 mm
1714 mmHeight1351 mm
1445 KgWeight700 Kg
2824 mmWheelbase2035 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Peugeot 806 and 1996 Rover Mini MK approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…