DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Peugeot 408 vs 2013 Skoda Rapid Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Peugeot 408

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeSkoda
408ModelRapid
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
189 km/hTop speed206 km/h
1587 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
117 HPPower122 HP
150 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption6,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,6 lt
—Average consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears7
215/55 R16Tyre size175/70 R14; 185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4688 mmLength4483 mm
1815 mmWidth1706 mm
1525 mmHeight1461 mm
1401 KgWeight1230 Kg
2710 mmWheelbase2602 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Peugeot 408 and 2013 Skoda Rapid approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Peugeot 408 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…