DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Peugeot 406 vs 2002 Mazda MPV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MPV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeMazda
406ModelMPV
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h12,8 s
210 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
140 HPPower141 HP
192 NmTorque207 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,3 ltUrban consumption13,3 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption10,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4600 mmLength4750 mm
1765 mmWidth1830 mm
1400 mmHeight1745 mm
1340 KgWeight1580 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2840 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Peugeot 406 and 2002 Mazda MPV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MPV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…