DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Peugeot 406 vs 2003 Daewoo Rezzo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Rezzo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeDaewoo
406ModelRezzo
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

14,5 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower105 HP
205 NmTorque169 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption—
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4598 mmLength4350 mm
1765 mmWidth1755 mm
1396 mmHeight1580 mm
1330 KgWeight1260 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Peugeot 406 and 2003 Daewoo Rezzo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Rezzo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…