DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Peugeot 406 vs 2000 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Peugeot 406

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeRenault
406ModelScenic
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

14,5 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
205 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank0 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption7 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4598 mmLength—
1765 mmWidth—
1396 mmHeight—
1330 KgWeight1365 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Peugeot 406 and 2000 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Peugeot 406 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…