2000 • Peugeot
406
Peugeot 406 2.0 HDI (110 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
2000 Peugeot 406 vs 2000 Saab 9-3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.0i (130 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Peugeot 406
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Peugeot 406SpecificationSaab 9-3
PeugeotMakeSaab
406Model9-3
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5
Performance
Peugeot 406SpecificationSaab 9-3
12,5 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
190 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
110 HPPower130 HP
250 NmTorque177 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Peugeot 406SpecificationSaab 9-3
DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption13,1 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Peugeot 406SpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Peugeot 406SpecificationSaab 9-3
—Length4629 mm
—Width1711 mm
—Height1428 mm
—Weight1295 Kg
—Wheelbase2605 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Peugeot 406 and 2000 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Peugeot 406 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…