DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Peugeot 406 vs 1999 Tata Sumo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Peugeot 406

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeTata
406ModelSumo
1999Model year1999
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
4+1Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h—
165 km/hTop speed106 km/h
1905 ccEngine displacement1948 cc
90 HPPower68 HP
201 NmTorque118 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption14 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption9,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/80 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4715 mmLength4450 mm
1760 mmWidth1765 mm
1450 mmHeight2080 mm
—Weight1700 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2400 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Peugeot 406 and 1999 Tata Sumo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Peugeot 406 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…