DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Peugeot 406 vs 1996 Rover 400 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Peugeot 406

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeRover
406Model400
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
4+1Seats4+1
4Doors5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h—
165 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1905 ccEngine displacement1800 cc
90 HPPower88 HP
201 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank0 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption—
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4715 mmLength—
1760 mmWidth—
1450 mmHeight—
2700 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Peugeot 406 and 1996 Rover 400 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Peugeot 406 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…