DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Peugeot 406 vs 2009 Citroen Jumpy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Peugeot 406

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

45.25–44.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeCitroen
406ModelJumpy
2004Model year2009
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats3
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
116 HPPower90 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank0 lt
—Urban consumption7,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,2 lt
—Average consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size215/65 R15C
—ABSYes

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Peugeot 406 and 2009 Citroen Jumpy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Peugeot 406 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…