DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Peugeot 307 vs 2006 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Peugeot 307

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeLand Rover
307ModelFreelander
2006Model year2006
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h14,4 s
0 km/hTop speed159 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1950 cc
109 HPPower112 HP
240 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/80 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4428 mmLength4368 mm
1762 mmWidth1809 mm
1560-1580 mmHeight1708 mm
1483-1492 KgWeight1565 Kg
2708 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Peugeot 307 and 2006 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Peugeot 307 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…