DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Audi RS Q3 vs 2018 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi RS Q3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 5 points.

98.5–93.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeFord
RS Q3ModelMustang
2016Model year2018
SUVBody typeCoupe, Fastback
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

4,8 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed262 km/h
2480 ccEngine displacement5031 cc
340 HPPower480 HP
450 NmTorque569 Nm
5Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank61 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
7 S tronicGears6
235/50 R 18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4411 mmLength4788 mm
1841 mmWidth1915 mm
1598 mmHeight1379 mm
1580 KgWeight1746 Kg
2603 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Audi RS Q3 and 2018 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi RS Q3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

Comments are loading…