DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Audi RS Q3 vs 2014 Volvo S60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

90.5–91.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi RS Q3SpecificationVolvo S60
AudiMakeVolvo
RS Q3ModelS60
2014Model year2014
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Audi RS Q3SpecificationVolvo S60
5,2 s0–100 km/h4,9 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2480 ccEngine displacement2953 cc
310 HPPower350 HP
420 NmTorque500 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Audi RS Q3SpecificationVolvo S60
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank67 lt
12,2 ltUrban consumption—
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,8 ltAverage consumption9,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi RS Q3SpecificationVolvo S60
4x4Drivetrain4x4
7 S tronicGears6
255/40 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi RS Q3SpecificationVolvo S60
4410 mmLength4635 mm
1841 mmWidth1899 mm
1580 mmHeight1484 mm
1655 KgWeight—
2603 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Audi RS Q3 and 2014 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…