DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Peugeot 306 vs 2002 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeOpel
306ModelOmega
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
201 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2171 cc
132 HPPower120 HP
180 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank75 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
—Average consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4338 mmLength4898 mm
1680 mmWidth1776 mm
1415 mmHeight1545 mm
1205 KgWeight1730 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Peugeot 306 and 2002 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…