E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2019 Audi RS 7 vs 2016 BMW M3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
RESULT

Tie

The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score.

98.5–98.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi RS 7SpecificationBMW M3
AudiMakeBMW
RS 7ModelM3
2019Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSedan
4Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Audi RS 7SpecificationBMW M3
3,7 s0–100 km/h4,2 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3993 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
605 HPPower450 HP
700 NmTorque550 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Audi RS 7SpecificationBMW M3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,3 ltUrban consumption12,0 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi RS 7SpecificationBMW M3
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8 tiptronicGears6
275/30 R21Tyre size265/30 ZR20 94Y; 285/30 ZR20 99Y
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi RS 7SpecificationBMW M3
5012 mmLength4671 mm
1911 mmWidth1877 mm
1419 mmHeight1431 mm
1930 KgWeight1535 Kg
2915 mmWheelbase2812 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2019 Audi RS 7 and 2016 BMW M3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score. The better choice therefore depends more heavily on priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance and equipment.

Comments are loading…