DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Audi RS 6 vs 2009 BMW 3 Serisi Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi RS 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 20.75 points.

96.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeBMW
RS 6Model3 Serisi
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

4,5 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4991 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
580 HPPower177 HP
650 NmTorque350 Nm
10Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank63 lt
20,3 ltUrban consumption—
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
13,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6 TiptronicGears6
255/40 R19Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4928 mmLength4580 mm
1889 mmWidth1782 mm
1456 mmHeight1384 mm
1985 KgWeight1670 Kg
2846 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Audi RS 6 and 2009 BMW 3 Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi RS 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 20.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

Comments are loading…