DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Peugeot 306 vs 2000 Rover Mini MK Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Mini MK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeRover
306ModelMini MK
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

15,3 s0–100 km/h12,7 s
172 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1361 ccEngine displacement1273 cc
75 HPPower63 HP
111 NmTorque95 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank34 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption8,5 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/65 R14Tyre size145/70 R12
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4338 mmLength3100 mm
1680 mmWidth1440 mm
1415 mmHeight1350 mm
1065 KgWeight700 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2035 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Peugeot 306 and 2000 Rover Mini MK approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…