E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Audi RS 6 vs 2024 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi RS 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 22.5 points.

93.5–71
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi RS 6SpecificationOpel Combo
AudiMakeOpel
RS 6ModelCombo
2002Model year2024
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats—
4Doors—

Performance

Audi RS 6SpecificationOpel Combo
4,9 s0–100 km/h11,4 s
250 km/hTop speed184 km/h
4172 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
450 HPPower130 HP
560 NmTorque300 Nm
8Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi RS 6SpecificationOpel Combo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
82 ltFuel tank50 lt
21,8 ltUrban consumption4,6 lt
10,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
14,6 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi RS 6SpecificationOpel Combo
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5 TiptronicGears8
—TransmissionAT8
255/40 R18Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi RS 6SpecificationOpel Combo
4858 mmLength4403 mm
1850 mmWidth1848 mm
1387-1426 mmHeight1841 mm
1840 KgWeight1541 kg
—Luggage capacity1355 lt
2759 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Audi RS 6

No additional feature records are available.

Opel ComboDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlCollision Avoidance SystemComing HomeLeaving HomeTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerKeyless Startstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsFront Parking SensorsRear Parking SensorsReversing CameraAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Audi RS 6 and 2024 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi RS 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 22.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

Comments are loading…