DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Peugeot 301 vs 2016 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Peugeot 301

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

59.25–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeCitroen
301ModelC3
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
188 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1587 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
115 HPPower99 HP
150 NmTorque254 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank48 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption3,6 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption2,9 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption3,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4442 mmLength3941 mm
1748 mmWidth1728 mm
1466 mmHeight1538 mm
1090 KgWeight1085 Kg
2652 mmWheelbase2466 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Peugeot 301 and 2016 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Peugeot 301 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…