2012 • Peugeot
301
Peugeot 301 1.6 VTi (115 Hp) 2012Overall Score57.25/100
2012 Peugeot 301 vs 2012 Citroen C-Crosser Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Citroen
C-Crosser
Citroen C-Crosser 2.2 HDi (156 Hp) 2012Overall Score70.75/100
WINNER
Citroen C-Crosser
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 13.5 points.
57.25–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Peugeot 301SpecificationCitroen C-Crosser
PeugeotMakeCitroen
301ModelC-Crosser
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
4Doors5
Performance
Peugeot 301SpecificationCitroen C-Crosser
10,3 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
188 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1587 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
115 HPPower156 HP
150 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Peugeot 301SpecificationCitroen C-Crosser
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Peugeot 301SpecificationCitroen C-Crosser
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
—Tyre size215/70 R16; 225/55 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Peugeot 301SpecificationCitroen C-Crosser
4442 mmLength4646 mm
1748 mmWidth1806 mm
1466 mmHeight1715 mm
1090 KgWeight1790-1825 Kg
2652 mmWheelbase2670 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Peugeot 301 and 2012 Citroen C-Crosser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen C-Crosser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 13.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…